![enola gay smithsonian exhibit enola gay smithsonian exhibit](https://api.time.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/enola-gay.jpg)
![enola gay smithsonian exhibit enola gay smithsonian exhibit](https://atomicarchive.com/media/photographs/tinian/media/enola-gay-crew.jpg)
(Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1997), 15. This is a "lie of omission," said the writer E.L. The Senate Rules and Administration Committee, which has oversight responsibility for the Smithsonian Institution, held two public hearings, May 11 and May 18, following national controversy over a planned display of the historic bomber Enola Gay at the Smithsonians National Air and Space Museum. related exhibits/memorials: the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, the Enola Gay. Only the fuselage was on display, accompanied by basic facts and information about the plane's restoration. Unlike the cancelled exhibition, ' Enola Gay ' contained no interpretation, no graphic images, and no melted objects. He said there was much more public discussion between 19 about the wisdom of the bombing, "there was a lot more openness, and a lot more doubt." On June 28, 1995, an exhibition, simply titled ' Enola Gay ,' opened at the National Air and Space Museum. "We've just broken ground in our history with a pre-emptive war," said Jean-Christophe Agnew, a cultural historian at Yale University. They want the bomber to serve as a catalyst for national debate on nuclear weapons. The Enola Gay became the center of a national controversy in 1995 when curators at the Air and Space Museums main facility on Washingtons National Mall proposed an exhibit that would grapple. The intellectuals and activists who are lining up to oppose this "celebratory treatment," say it is particularly dangerous at a time when the United States is displaying its military might. The Smithsonian, which is heavily supported by federal money, increased the estimate to 1 million, which then drew historians' complaints of "historical cleansing." A compromise was reached for a pared-down exhibit in 1995.Īs it was before, the argument is as much about politics as history. Truman's decision to approve use of the bomb. The groups also took issue with the number of Americans - 30,000 to 50, 000 - military officials anticipated would have been killed in an invasion of Japan and which has been cited as the crucial factor in President Harry S.